<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6184</link>
    <description>A partnership deed naming the partners in their individual capacity was not unlawful merely because some partners may have acted for Hindu undivided families, since a Hindu undivided family is not itself a juristic person capable of becoming a partner and the firm is treated as one between the karta and the other partners. For registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income-tax Officer must confine the enquiry to the partnership deed and statutory requirements; he cannot go behind the instrument to investigate beneficial or representative ownership. Where the deed showed a genuine partnership with specified shares and legal validity, registration was available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 14:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (4) TMI 5 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6184</link>
      <description>A partnership deed naming the partners in their individual capacity was not unlawful merely because some partners may have acted for Hindu undivided families, since a Hindu undivided family is not itself a juristic person capable of becoming a partner and the firm is treated as one between the karta and the other partners. For registration under section 26A of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, the Income-tax Officer must confine the enquiry to the partnership deed and statutory requirements; he cannot go behind the instrument to investigate beneficial or representative ownership. Where the deed showed a genuine partnership with specified shares and legal validity, registration was available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6184</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>