<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1168 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336523</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the mandatory deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act could be made from the CENVAT Credit Account if compliant with the CENVAT Credit Rules. The case was remanded to the First Appellate Authority for further consideration based on the correct interpretation of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:15:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1168 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336523</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the mandatory deposit under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act could be made from the CENVAT Credit Account if compliant with the CENVAT Credit Rules. The case was remanded to the First Appellate Authority for further consideration based on the correct interpretation of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>