https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336503 The tribunal held that NCLT has jurisdiction to adjudicate transferred matters under Sections 163 and 219 of the old Companies Act. It determined that the cases should be decided based on the provisions of the old Act, as the cause of action predated the new Act. The tribunal dismissed the petitioner's argument on maintainability, affirming NCLT's jurisdiction over the transferred cases. The decision emphasized the significance of the savings clause in Section 465 and the relevance of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act in preserving legal proceedings under the repealed Companies Act, 1956. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:13:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336503 The tribunal held that NCLT has jurisdiction to adjudicate transferred matters under Sections 163 and 219 of the old Companies Act. It determined that the cases should be decided based on the provisions of the old Act, as the cause of action predated the new Act. The tribunal dismissed the petitioner's argument on maintainability, affirming NCLT's jurisdiction over the transferred cases. The decision emphasized the significance of the savings clause in Section 465 and the relevance of Section 6 of the General Clauses Act in preserving legal proceedings under the repealed Companies Act, 1956. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336503