https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189003 The High Court held that the petitioner, who had been exonerated by the adjudicating authority, was not required to return to the trial court before invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction. The court found it unjust to continue criminal proceedings after exoneration and ruled that the High Court could quash the proceedings. Emphasizing that criminal prosecution cannot proceed if an authority finds no case against a person, the High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner in the Court of A.C.M.M., New Delhi. en-us Fri, 31 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:54:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189003 The High Court held that the petitioner, who had been exonerated by the adjudicating authority, was not required to return to the trial court before invoking the High Court's inherent jurisdiction. The court found it unjust to continue criminal proceedings after exoneration and ruled that the High Court could quash the proceedings. Emphasizing that criminal prosecution cannot proceed if an authority finds no case against a person, the High Court quashed the criminal proceedings against the petitioner in the Court of A.C.M.M., New Delhi. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 31 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189003