<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (6) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189000</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under &#039;Fees for included services&#039; u/s Article 12 of the India-US Treaty for the relevant assessment year. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, as the ITAT found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, which was based on previous ITAT decisions in the appellant&#039;s own case for different assessment years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452628" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (6) TMI 849 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189000</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under &#039;Fees for included services&#039; u/s Article 12 of the India-US Treaty for the relevant assessment year. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, as the ITAT found no infirmity in the CIT(A)&#039;s order, which was based on previous ITAT decisions in the appellant&#039;s own case for different assessment years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>