<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2591 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188995</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision in a case involving fraudulent cenvat credit claims by the appellants, who used invoices for goods not received. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating cenvat credit claims with valid evidence and dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants. The judgment underscores the consequences of fraudulent practices in availing cenvat credits and highlights the necessity for appellants to effectively challenge opposing evidence in excise matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2591 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188995</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities&#039; decision in a case involving fraudulent cenvat credit claims by the appellants, who used invoices for goods not received. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating cenvat credit claims with valid evidence and dismissed the appeals filed by the appellants. The judgment underscores the consequences of fraudulent practices in availing cenvat credits and highlights the necessity for appellants to effectively challenge opposing evidence in excise matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>