<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 606 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188989</link>
    <description>The SC overturned the CEGAT&#039;s decision, reinstating the Commissioner&#039;s order. It found that respondent no.1 engaged in fraudulent acts and mis-declarations, confirming that duty was not paid on 25.2.1999. The SC upheld the demand for duty, confiscation of goods under Section 111(j), and penalties under Section 112(b). Appeals were allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 15:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 606 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188989</link>
      <description>The SC overturned the CEGAT&#039;s decision, reinstating the Commissioner&#039;s order. It found that respondent no.1 engaged in fraudulent acts and mis-declarations, confirming that duty was not paid on 25.2.1999. The SC upheld the demand for duty, confiscation of goods under Section 111(j), and penalties under Section 112(b). Appeals were allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>