https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188987 The Supreme Court held that the renewal of a permit for a route overlapping a notified route by three miles is impermissible under the Bangalore Scheme. The Court emphasized that State Undertakings can take over any route under approved schemes, excluding private operators from overlapping notified routes. The interpretation of "route" under the Motor Vehicles Act was crucial, distinguishing it from "road." The Court invalidated the permit renewal, directing compliance with the scheme's provisions. Justice Beg highlighted the need for clarity in scheme provisions and suggested that mere overlapping does not bar private operators from running on non-notified routes. en-us Thu, 08 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:25:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188987 The Supreme Court held that the renewal of a permit for a route overlapping a notified route by three miles is impermissible under the Bangalore Scheme. The Court emphasized that State Undertakings can take over any route under approved schemes, excluding private operators from overlapping notified routes. The interpretation of "route" under the Motor Vehicles Act was crucial, distinguishing it from "road." The Court invalidated the permit renewal, directing compliance with the scheme's provisions. Justice Beg highlighted the need for clarity in scheme provisions and suggested that mere overlapping does not bar private operators from running on non-notified routes. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 08 Aug 1974 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188987