<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1091 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188985</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that common carriers are liable as insurers under the Consumers Protection Act, shifting the burden of proof to carriers to prove absence of negligence. The principle of common law applies, even if Section 9 of the Carriers Act does not directly apply. The Court dismissed the special leave petitions based on this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:50:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1091 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188985</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that common carriers are liable as insurers under the Consumers Protection Act, shifting the burden of proof to carriers to prove absence of negligence. The principle of common law applies, even if Section 9 of the Carriers Act does not directly apply. The Court dismissed the special leave petitions based on this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188985</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>