<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (12) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6176</link>
    <description>Best judgment assessment must rest on relevant material and a reasoned application of judgment; rejection of the assessee&#039;s books as unreliable does not, by itself, justify an arbitrary enhancement of income. Where the enhancing authority gave no basis for the increase and the appellate tribunal merely affirmed that approach without addressing the limited scope of best judgment assessment, the enhancement could not stand. The High Court was right to set aside the appellate orders, and the assessee&#039;s relief was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45259" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (12) TMI 2 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6176</link>
      <description>Best judgment assessment must rest on relevant material and a reasoned application of judgment; rejection of the assessee&#039;s books as unreliable does not, by itself, justify an arbitrary enhancement of income. Where the enhancing authority gave no basis for the increase and the appellate tribunal merely affirmed that approach without addressing the limited scope of best judgment assessment, the enhancement could not stand. The High Court was right to set aside the appellate orders, and the assessee&#039;s relief was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>