<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336491</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the borrowed/loan services charges are not taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) or Fees for Included Services (FIS) under the Indo-US and Indo-Singapore DTAA. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) order from previous assessment years and directed the Assessing Officer to grant relief accordingly. All ten appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:45:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336491</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the borrowed/loan services charges are not taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS) or Fees for Included Services (FIS) under the Indo-US and Indo-Singapore DTAA. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) order from previous assessment years and directed the Assessing Officer to grant relief accordingly. All ten appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>