<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 640 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188979</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deductions for interest and upfront fees claimed by the assessee for setting up a new unit, considering it as an expansion of the existing business. The Tribunal found that the new unit was not a separate business but part of the existing one, based on common management, control, and funds. The court directed the matter to be heard by a Larger Bench due to conflicting judgments on similar issues in previous cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:34:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 640 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188979</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow deductions for interest and upfront fees claimed by the assessee for setting up a new unit, considering it as an expansion of the existing business. The Tribunal found that the new unit was not a separate business but part of the existing one, based on common management, control, and funds. The court directed the matter to be heard by a Larger Bench due to conflicting judgments on similar issues in previous cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188979</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>