<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336487</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of by allowing the refund on to and fro freight charges, deeming certain other charges eligible for refund under port services, and upholding the rejection of the claim based on limitation grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1132 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336487</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of by allowing the refund on to and fro freight charges, deeming certain other charges eligible for refund under port services, and upholding the rejection of the claim based on limitation grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>