<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1131 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336486</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original, determining that the activities under the composite contract constituted &#039;Mining Services&#039; taxable from 18.06.2007. The Tribunal held that the contract could not be taxed under &#039;Site Preparation&#039; or &#039;Cargo Handling Services&#039; before that date, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The issue of time-barred demand and penalties was not addressed as the appeal was decided on its merits in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2017 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1131 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336486</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original, determining that the activities under the composite contract constituted &#039;Mining Services&#039; taxable from 18.06.2007. The Tribunal held that the contract could not be taxed under &#039;Site Preparation&#039; or &#039;Cargo Handling Services&#039; before that date, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s contentions. The issue of time-barred demand and penalties was not addressed as the appeal was decided on its merits in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336486</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>