<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1128 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336483</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a demand for service tax on general insurance services provided as a co-insurer. The appellant successfully argued that the lead insurer had already paid the service tax on the entire premium received, and there was no separate service provided by the lead insurer to the co-insurer. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the order and penalties imposed, stating that the service tax liability had been fulfilled by the lead insurer, and there was no justification for imposing additional tax on the co-insurers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 11:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452563" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1128 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336483</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving a demand for service tax on general insurance services provided as a co-insurer. The appellant successfully argued that the lead insurer had already paid the service tax on the entire premium received, and there was no separate service provided by the lead insurer to the co-insurer. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the order and penalties imposed, stating that the service tax liability had been fulfilled by the lead insurer, and there was no justification for imposing additional tax on the co-insurers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>