<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1126 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336481</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s ruling, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal against the setting aside of the demand for fraudulent availment of CENVAT credit by M/s. SS Organics Ltd. The decision emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and thorough investigation to prove fraudulent activities, stressing the importance of comprehensive verification and corroboration in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1126 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336481</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the Commissioner(Appeals)&#039;s ruling, dismissing the Department&#039;s appeal against the setting aside of the demand for fraudulent availment of CENVAT credit by M/s. SS Organics Ltd. The decision emphasized the necessity of substantial evidence and thorough investigation to prove fraudulent activities, stressing the importance of comprehensive verification and corroboration in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>