https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336474 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a pharmaceutical products manufacturer, in a case concerning the denial of SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2000-CE for using another person's brand name. The Tribunal found that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant and that the demand was time-barred under Section 11A. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on the grounds of being time-barred. The judgment was pronounced on 26.09.2016. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336474 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a pharmaceutical products manufacturer, in a case concerning the denial of SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2000-CE for using another person's brand name. The Tribunal found that there was no suppression of facts by the appellant and that the demand was time-barred under Section 11A. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed on the grounds of being time-barred. The judgment was pronounced on 26.09.2016. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336474