<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 884 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188974</link>
    <description>Sales tax administration may require advance tax payment and departmental delivery notes for specified interstate consignments where statutory supervisory and instructional powers support measures to secure collection and prevent evasion. Transit provisions permit verification of documents, detention of goods where tax evasion or non-payment is reasonably apprehended, and recovery of tax before release. Such measures operate as part of the charging and collection machinery rather than as unauthorized restrictions. Differential treatment of specified commodities withstands equality scrutiny where it rests on a real and reasonable distinction linked to large-scale evasion. The protective collection measures and related classification remain valid within the statutory framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:57:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452510" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 884 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188974</link>
      <description>Sales tax administration may require advance tax payment and departmental delivery notes for specified interstate consignments where statutory supervisory and instructional powers support measures to secure collection and prevent evasion. Transit provisions permit verification of documents, detention of goods where tax evasion or non-payment is reasonably apprehended, and recovery of tax before release. Such measures operate as part of the charging and collection machinery rather than as unauthorized restrictions. Differential treatment of specified commodities withstands equality scrutiny where it rests on a real and reasonable distinction linked to large-scale evasion. The protective collection measures and related classification remain valid within the statutory framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>