https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188973 The court upheld the validity of the notifications and the Amendment Act, dismissing all contentions raised by the petitioners regarding the Ordinance's constitutionality. The court found that the power to extend the Ordinance's operation was valid under the principle of conditional legislation. It clarified that the Rajpramukh's authority post the constitution of the Rajasthan Legislature was legitimate and that the Amendment Act was valid. Additionally, the court held that the Ordinance did not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution, ultimately dismissing the petitions without costs. en-us Fri, 08 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:52:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188973 The court upheld the validity of the notifications and the Amendment Act, dismissing all contentions raised by the petitioners regarding the Ordinance's constitutionality. The court found that the power to extend the Ordinance's operation was valid under the principle of conditional legislation. It clarified that the Rajpramukh's authority post the constitution of the Rajasthan Legislature was legitimate and that the Amendment Act was valid. Additionally, the court held that the Ordinance did not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(f) of the Constitution, ultimately dismissing the petitions without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Feb 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188973