<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188966</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as the demand for interest and penalty for delayed reversal of cenvat credit was found to be time-barred due to the issuance of the Show Cause Notice beyond the limitation period. The judgment emphasized that the limitation period applies not only to the principal amount but also to the interest claimed. The impugned order confirming the demand was set aside by the Member (Judicial), concluding that it lacked merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188966</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant as the demand for interest and penalty for delayed reversal of cenvat credit was found to be time-barred due to the issuance of the Show Cause Notice beyond the limitation period. The judgment emphasized that the limitation period applies not only to the principal amount but also to the interest claimed. The impugned order confirming the demand was set aside by the Member (Judicial), concluding that it lacked merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188966</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>