<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1000 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188967</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice under Section 274 was defective as it did not specify the grounds for imposing the penalty. Relying on a previous High Court decision, the Tribunal invalidated the penalty orders and canceled the penalties imposed on the Assessee. It was emphasized that Section 292B could not rectify the fundamental defect in jurisdiction assumption. Therefore, the Assessee&#039;s appeals were successful, and the penalty orders were revoked.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1000 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188967</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the show cause notice under Section 274 was defective as it did not specify the grounds for imposing the penalty. Relying on a previous High Court decision, the Tribunal invalidated the penalty orders and canceled the penalties imposed on the Assessee. It was emphasized that Section 292B could not rectify the fundamental defect in jurisdiction assumption. Therefore, the Assessee&#039;s appeals were successful, and the penalty orders were revoked.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>