<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1148 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188971</link>
    <description>Bail on medical grounds was refused under Section 439 CrPC read with the first proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA because the applicant failed to show a medical necessity for release. The Court relied on a specialist medical board report noting hypertension, controlled diabetes, bronchial asthma, obstructive sleep apnea and other chronic conditions, but finding the clinical condition stable on existing medication. It also accepted the prosecution&#039;s explanation on the disputed medical entries and found no material requiring immediate treatment from a particular doctor or hospital. The gravity of the allegations was also considered, and the request for bail was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1148 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188971</link>
      <description>Bail on medical grounds was refused under Section 439 CrPC read with the first proviso to Section 45(1) of the PMLA because the applicant failed to show a medical necessity for release. The Court relied on a specialist medical board report noting hypertension, controlled diabetes, bronchial asthma, obstructive sleep apnea and other chronic conditions, but finding the clinical condition stable on existing medication. It also accepted the prosecution&#039;s explanation on the disputed medical entries and found no material requiring immediate treatment from a particular doctor or hospital. The gravity of the allegations was also considered, and the request for bail was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188971</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>