<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1097 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336452</link>
    <description>Reassessment under Section 31 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act cannot rest on a mere later judicial ruling alone; the prescribed authority must have reasonable grounds based on fresh material, and reopening on a pure change of opinion is impermissible. On that basis, proceedings founded only on the Supreme Court&#039;s later view on mobile phone chargers were quashed where assessment or reassessment had already been completed. In the remaining matters, disputed questions on liability and classification made the statutory appellate remedy more appropriate, so writ interference was declined and the petitioners were relegated to the appeal mechanism.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 07:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1097 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336452</link>
      <description>Reassessment under Section 31 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act cannot rest on a mere later judicial ruling alone; the prescribed authority must have reasonable grounds based on fresh material, and reopening on a pure change of opinion is impermissible. On that basis, proceedings founded only on the Supreme Court&#039;s later view on mobile phone chargers were quashed where assessment or reassessment had already been completed. In the remaining matters, disputed questions on liability and classification made the statutory appellate remedy more appropriate, so writ interference was declined and the petitioners were relegated to the appeal mechanism.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>