https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336448 Where multiple cheque-dishonour convictions arise from one transaction and one liability, the substantive custodial sentence may be directed to run concurrently because separate complaints do not, by themselves, create distinct transactions for sentencing. The note also states that default imprisonment for non-payment of compensation or fine is governed by its own statutory limits and cannot be treated in the same way as substantive imprisonment; on that footing, the default term was considered excessive and reduced. The convictions were maintained, but the sentencing structure was modified by making the substantive sentence concurrent and shortening the default imprisonment. en-us Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Dec 2016 06:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336448 Where multiple cheque-dishonour convictions arise from one transaction and one liability, the substantive custodial sentence may be directed to run concurrently because separate complaints do not, by themselves, create distinct transactions for sentencing. The note also states that default imprisonment for non-payment of compensation or fine is governed by its own statutory limits and cannot be treated in the same way as substantive imprisonment; on that footing, the default term was considered excessive and reduced. The convictions were maintained, but the sentencing structure was modified by making the substantive sentence concurrent and shortening the default imprisonment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336448