<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 684 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188942</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh, upholding the Madhya Pradesh High Court&#039;s decision on compulsory retirement orders. The High Court found some orders supportable, allowing certain employees to rejoin until reaching superannuation. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s direction for full back wages up to a certain date but disagreed with the 50% back wages payment for the first period. The Court emphasized the need to consider various factors in determining back wages and reiterated that compulsory retirement aims to remove unsuitable employees, not punish them. The case concluded without costs, settling the dispute over retirement orders and back wages.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 684 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188942</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh, upholding the Madhya Pradesh High Court&#039;s decision on compulsory retirement orders. The High Court found some orders supportable, allowing certain employees to rejoin until reaching superannuation. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s direction for full back wages up to a certain date but disagreed with the 50% back wages payment for the first period. The Court emphasized the need to consider various factors in determining back wages and reiterated that compulsory retirement aims to remove unsuitable employees, not punish them. The case concluded without costs, settling the dispute over retirement orders and back wages.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188942</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>