<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6161</link>
    <description>SC upheld disallowance of deductions for rent, repairs, depreciation and maintenance of a guest-house used in connection with business, finding that section 37(4)-(5) clearly excludes such expenses. The court applied literal statutory interpretation, noting the Legislature deliberately distinguished guest-houses from other premises covered by sections 30-32; prior authorities relied on by the taxpayer were inapplicable. The appeal against the disallowance was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 22:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45244" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 30 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6161</link>
      <description>SC upheld disallowance of deductions for rent, repairs, depreciation and maintenance of a guest-house used in connection with business, finding that section 37(4)-(5) clearly excludes such expenses. The court applied literal statutory interpretation, noting the Legislature deliberately distinguished guest-houses from other premises covered by sections 30-32; prior authorities relied on by the taxpayer were inapplicable. The appeal against the disallowance was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>