<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (6) TMI 803 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188936</link>
    <description>The High Court held that receipts from premium on import licence, sale of scrap, miscellaneous garden income, and excise duty rebate should be considered part of the composite income before apportionment under r. 8 of the IT Rules, 1962. The Court emphasized that these receipts were directly connected to the business of growing and manufacturing tea. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the lower authorities excluding these receipts were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:33:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (6) TMI 803 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188936</link>
      <description>The High Court held that receipts from premium on import licence, sale of scrap, miscellaneous garden income, and excise duty rebate should be considered part of the composite income before apportionment under r. 8 of the IT Rules, 1962. The Court emphasized that these receipts were directly connected to the business of growing and manufacturing tea. The appeal was allowed, and the orders of the lower authorities excluding these receipts were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>