<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1091 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336446</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the special leave petition and dismissed it. The operative effect is that the petitioner obtained relief on delay, yet the challenge was not admitted for further examination on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1091 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336446</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no reason to entertain the special leave petition and dismissed it. The operative effect is that the petitioner obtained relief on delay, yet the challenge was not admitted for further examination on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336446</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>