<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1080 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336435</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for various assessment years, restricting the disallowance of expenses related to exempt income to the amount voluntarily offered by the assessee. The decision was based on the reasoning applied for the assessment year 2008-09, where the Tribunal found the AO&#039;s additional disallowance excessive. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and those of the revenue were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:54:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452407" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1080 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336435</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeals for various assessment years, restricting the disallowance of expenses related to exempt income to the amount voluntarily offered by the assessee. The decision was based on the reasoning applied for the assessment year 2008-09, where the Tribunal found the AO&#039;s additional disallowance excessive. Consequently, the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and those of the revenue were dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336435</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>