<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1079 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336434</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances made under Sections 40A(2) and 36(1)(iii). The tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with comparable cases and the relevance of commercial expediency in business transactions. The judgments relied upon by the assessee were found to be directly applicable, leading to the favorable outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Apr 2017 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1079 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336434</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of disallowances made under Sections 40A(2) and 36(1)(iii). The tribunal emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with comparable cases and the relevance of commercial expediency in business transactions. The judgments relied upon by the assessee were found to be directly applicable, leading to the favorable outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336434</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>