https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336411 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals. It emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue's claim of clandestine removal based on waste generated at the second stage of Kraft paper manufacture. The appellants provided technical support showing that the waste, termed 'broke,' was re-fed into the manufacturing process and not cleared as finished goods. The Tribunal found no factual or technical basis for the Revenue's allegations, concluding that the demand for Central Excise duty was not justified. en-us Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Feb 2018 13:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336411 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeals. It emphasized the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue's claim of clandestine removal based on waste generated at the second stage of Kraft paper manufacture. The appellants provided technical support showing that the waste, termed 'broke,' was re-fed into the manufacturing process and not cleared as finished goods. The Tribunal found no factual or technical basis for the Revenue's allegations, concluding that the demand for Central Excise duty was not justified. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 24 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336411