<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6153</link>
    <description>SC held that surrender of a tenancy right is a capital asset and the amount received is a capital receipt taxable only under the capital gains provision (s.45) and, if at all, under item E of s.14. It cannot be recharacterized as casual or non-recurring income under s.10(3)/s.56 or taxed under the residuary head merely because computation under s.48 is inapplicable. The court rejected treating statutory exemptions from capital gains as taxable under s.56 and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2025 18:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 13 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6153</link>
      <description>SC held that surrender of a tenancy right is a capital asset and the amount received is a capital receipt taxable only under the capital gains provision (s.45) and, if at all, under item E of s.14. It cannot be recharacterized as casual or non-recurring income under s.10(3)/s.56 or taxed under the residuary head merely because computation under s.48 is inapplicable. The court rejected treating statutory exemptions from capital gains as taxable under s.56 and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>