<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1040 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336395</link>
    <description>Fabricated steel structures and fish plates used to make steel platforms for welding railway wagons were treated as neither capital goods nor eligible inputs under Rule 2 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, so Cenvat credit was denied. On penalty, the record showed favourable case law was already available before the First Appellate Authority, and the penalty was therefore considered unjustified and was set aside. The result was that the credit disallowance remained in place, while only the penalty relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1040 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336395</link>
      <description>Fabricated steel structures and fish plates used to make steel platforms for welding railway wagons were treated as neither capital goods nor eligible inputs under Rule 2 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002, so Cenvat credit was denied. On penalty, the record showed favourable case law was already available before the First Appellate Authority, and the penalty was therefore considered unjustified and was set aside. The result was that the credit disallowance remained in place, while only the penalty relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>