<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1033 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and redemption fine but set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant in a case involving misdeclaration of goods in export documents. Despite discrepancies in descriptions, the Tribunal found no evidence of intentional deception for undue benefits, attributing the errors to clerical mistakes. The judgment partially allowed the appeal, modifying the decision to remove the penalty while maintaining the confiscation and redemption fine.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1033 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation and redemption fine but set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant in a case involving misdeclaration of goods in export documents. Despite discrepancies in descriptions, the Tribunal found no evidence of intentional deception for undue benefits, attributing the errors to clerical mistakes. The judgment partially allowed the appeal, modifying the decision to remove the penalty while maintaining the confiscation and redemption fine.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>