<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1025 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the redemption fine of &amp;amp;8377; 1.00 Lakh imposed by the Adjudicating authority to be grossly inadequate and enhanced it to &amp;amp;8377; 25.00 Lakhs under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to the substantial profit margin obtained from the sale of the seized goods. The Appeals filed by the Revenue were allowed, increasing the redemption fine to ensure appropriate penalties in line with the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1025 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the redemption fine of &amp;amp;8377; 1.00 Lakh imposed by the Adjudicating authority to be grossly inadequate and enhanced it to &amp;amp;8377; 25.00 Lakhs under Section 125 of the Customs Act, 1962, due to the substantial profit margin obtained from the sale of the seized goods. The Appeals filed by the Revenue were allowed, increasing the redemption fine to ensure appropriate penalties in line with the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>