https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336379 The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding penalties under Sec 114 (i) & Sec 114 AA of the Customs Act 1962, as there was no evidence of the appellant's knowledge of the prohibited nature of the feathers. Penalties were waived. However, the confiscation of the consignment was upheld due to the use of prohibited Ostrich feathers in the exported silk fabrics. en-us Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 18 Aug 2017 17:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336379 The CESTAT ruled in favor of the appellant regarding penalties under Sec 114 (i) & Sec 114 AA of the Customs Act 1962, as there was no evidence of the appellant's knowledge of the prohibited nature of the feathers. Penalties were waived. However, the confiscation of the consignment was upheld due to the use of prohibited Ostrich feathers in the exported silk fabrics. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 05 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336379