https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336377 Assessment orders challenged for alleged denial of opportunity and non-application of mind were not interfered with in writ jurisdiction. The Court noted that, even if records were not specifically called for at the assessment stage, the petitioner should not be left without a remedy. It directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory rectification mechanism under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, place all objections and supporting documents before the authority, and receive a personal hearing. Coercive recovery was ordered to remain in abeyance until the rectification request was considered. en-us Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Dec 2016 07:46:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336377 Assessment orders challenged for alleged denial of opportunity and non-application of mind were not interfered with in writ jurisdiction. The Court noted that, even if records were not specifically called for at the assessment stage, the petitioner should not be left without a remedy. It directed the petitioner to pursue the statutory rectification mechanism under Section 84 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, place all objections and supporting documents before the authority, and receive a personal hearing. Coercive recovery was ordered to remain in abeyance until the rectification request was considered. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 02 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336377