<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 636 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188917</link>
    <description>Where a penalty for alleged concealment under the Income-tax Act had been deleted in appeal, criminal prosecution under the same Act based on the same seized material was treated as unsustainable. The Rajasthan HC noted the principle that, once the penalty no longer survives, prosecution founded on that identical basis need not continue. The sanction orders and the complaint were therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:29:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 636 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188917</link>
      <description>Where a penalty for alleged concealment under the Income-tax Act had been deleted in appeal, criminal prosecution under the same Act based on the same seized material was treated as unsustainable. The Rajasthan HC noted the principle that, once the penalty no longer survives, prosecution founded on that identical basis need not continue. The sanction orders and the complaint were therefore quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>