https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188909 The High Court upheld that the properties in question were ancestral joint family properties, not self-acquired as claimed in the will. The court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeals, confirming their entitlement to a 2/19th share in the joint family properties and liabilities. The decree mandated partition of the joint family properties as of 11th July 1940, accounting for income until final partition, while separate businesses post that date were not subject to partition. Plaintiffs were to receive possession of their share, with costs to be borne by the appellants as per the High Court's order. en-us Mon, 20 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:34:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188909 The High Court upheld that the properties in question were ancestral joint family properties, not self-acquired as claimed in the will. The court dismissed the plaintiffs' appeals, confirming their entitlement to a 2/19th share in the joint family properties and liabilities. The decree mandated partition of the joint family properties as of 11th July 1940, accounting for income until final partition, while separate businesses post that date were not subject to partition. Plaintiffs were to receive possession of their share, with costs to be borne by the appellants as per the High Court's order. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Sep 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188909