<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6145</link>
    <description>The court held that as clearance was not granted to the appellants, the proceedings could not continue. The judgment emphasized the importance of abiding by the High Powered Committee&#039;s decisions to prevent frivolous litigation and uphold the efficiency of the dispute resolution mechanism. The appeal was disposed of with a directive for the respondents to proceed with the order, while the appellants retained the right to pursue legal remedies if affected by the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45228" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 7 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6145</link>
      <description>The court held that as clearance was not granted to the appellants, the proceedings could not continue. The judgment emphasized the importance of abiding by the High Powered Committee&#039;s decisions to prevent frivolous litigation and uphold the efficiency of the dispute resolution mechanism. The appeal was disposed of with a directive for the respondents to proceed with the order, while the appellants retained the right to pursue legal remedies if affected by the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>