<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 683 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188903</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC granted interim relief to the Petitioner in a case where the Respondents failed to provide instructions despite adjournments. The relief aimed to prevent coercive recovery steps while related appeals were pending, in line with prayer clause (d), and the court expedited the hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:09:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452268" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 683 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188903</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC granted interim relief to the Petitioner in a case where the Respondents failed to provide instructions despite adjournments. The relief aimed to prevent coercive recovery steps while related appeals were pending, in line with prayer clause (d), and the court expedited the hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>