<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (12) TMI 1602 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the explanation provided was acceptable, highlighting the lack of evidence of deliberate concealment and the voluntary surrender of the disputed amount. It was concluded that the penalty was not justified, leading to the cancellation of the penalty orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:55:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452267" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (12) TMI 1602 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the explanation provided was acceptable, highlighting the lack of evidence of deliberate concealment and the voluntary surrender of the disputed amount. It was concluded that the penalty was not justified, leading to the cancellation of the penalty orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>