<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (3) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188901</link>
    <description>A statutory emergency power that bypasses notice and inquiry can be invoked only if the authority records reasons in the order itself. The recorded-reasons safeguard was treated as mandatory, and its absence could not be cured by file notes, reports, or a bare recital of statutory language; the resulting orders and downstream demands were therefore invalid. A writ court may quash demands founded on void jurisdictional orders, and the availability of alternative statutory remedies does not bar relief where the impugned demands rest on a failure to satisfy a condition precedent. Prior timing of some orders before the Constitution did not prevent challenge to later demands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452265" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (3) TMI 104 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188901</link>
      <description>A statutory emergency power that bypasses notice and inquiry can be invoked only if the authority records reasons in the order itself. The recorded-reasons safeguard was treated as mandatory, and its absence could not be cured by file notes, reports, or a bare recital of statutory language; the resulting orders and downstream demands were therefore invalid. A writ court may quash demands founded on void jurisdictional orders, and the availability of alternative statutory remedies does not bar relief where the impugned demands rest on a failure to satisfy a condition precedent. Prior timing of some orders before the Constitution did not prevent challenge to later demands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>