<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1007 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336362</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the orders under Section 179 and Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine the actual amount due from the defaulting company and the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to pay the admitted tax due of Rs. 5 lakhs by a specified date. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petition. The Court emphasized adherence to natural justice principles in further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452234" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1007 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336362</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the orders under Section 179 and Section 264 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and restored the matter to the Assessing Officer to determine the actual amount due from the defaulting company and the petitioner. The petitioner was directed to pay the admitted tax due of Rs. 5 lakhs by a specified date. Failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petition. The Court emphasized adherence to natural justice principles in further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336362</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>