<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 997 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188891</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the Cross Objection of the assessee in a case concerning the reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the Assessing Officer did not independently apply his mind to the material received, rendering the reopening invalid in law. The judgment emphasized the necessity for a valid reason to believe that income had escaped assessment before reopening assessments under section 148.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:43:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 997 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188891</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and allowed the Cross Objection of the assessee in a case concerning the reopening of assessment under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the Assessing Officer did not independently apply his mind to the material received, rendering the reopening invalid in law. The judgment emphasized the necessity for a valid reason to believe that income had escaped assessment before reopening assessments under section 148.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>