<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6139</link>
    <description>SC held the Tribunal was justified in directing the Income-tax Officer to allow deduction of central excise and customs duties under s.43B where those duties were included in the value of closing stock. The assessee, a company manufacturing and selling paints, varnishes and allied products, was entitled to the deduction because the expenditure related to duties had been incurred and formed part of inventory valuation, making the claim allowable for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=45222" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 4 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6139</link>
      <description>SC held the Tribunal was justified in directing the Income-tax Officer to allow deduction of central excise and customs duties under s.43B where those duties were included in the value of closing stock. The assessee, a company manufacturing and selling paints, varnishes and allied products, was entitled to the deduction because the expenditure related to duties had been incurred and formed part of inventory valuation, making the claim allowable for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=6139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>