https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188895 The Court found merit in the petitioners' arguments challenging the Disclosure Statements issued under Rule 16 of the Customs Tariff for the mid-term review of Anti-Dumping Duty on Soda Ash. It noted deficiencies in the Disclosure Statements that hindered the petitioners' ability to respond adequately and violated principles of natural justice. As a result, the Court directed the authority to withhold final findings on the review, allowing more time for the petitioners to present their case fairly. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and ensuring a transparent process in such reviews. en-us Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2017 11:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188895 The Court found merit in the petitioners' arguments challenging the Disclosure Statements issued under Rule 16 of the Customs Tariff for the mid-term review of Anti-Dumping Duty on Soda Ash. It noted deficiencies in the Disclosure Statements that hindered the petitioners' ability to respond adequately and violated principles of natural justice. As a result, the Court directed the authority to withhold final findings on the review, allowing more time for the petitioners to present their case fairly. The judgment underscored the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and ensuring a transparent process in such reviews. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188895