https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336343 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order partially allowing refund of service tax credit under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 for specific services. The appellant, a pharmaceutical manufacturing 100% EOU, successfully contested rejections of refund claims for various input services like management, maintenance, repair, manpower recruitment, and security agency services. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to most input service refunds, remanding only the quantification of the refund for business support service to the original authority for further review. en-us Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:05:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336343 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the Commissioner (A)'s order partially allowing refund of service tax credit under Rule 5 of CCR, 2004 for specific services. The appellant, a pharmaceutical manufacturing 100% EOU, successfully contested rejections of refund claims for various input services like management, maintenance, repair, manpower recruitment, and security agency services. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to most input service refunds, remanding only the quantification of the refund for business support service to the original authority for further review. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336343