<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 986 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336341</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for a fresh consideration following the Settlement Commission&#039;s directives. The decision aimed at resolving issues related to interest liability calculation, document provision, and refund claims in accordance with legal directives and procedural fairness, ensuring adherence to principles of justice and procedural correctness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=452195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 986 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336341</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the original authority for a fresh consideration following the Settlement Commission&#039;s directives. The decision aimed at resolving issues related to interest liability calculation, document provision, and refund claims in accordance with legal directives and procedural fairness, ensuring adherence to principles of justice and procedural correctness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>