https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336337 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and confirming their entitlement to Cenvat credit for services distributed by the Head Office related to products manufactured in a different factory of the same company. The tribunal emphasized that there is no requirement for a one-to-one correlation between the credit distribution and the quantum of service used by a particular factory, citing legal provisions and precedents supporting the appellant's position. en-us Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 01 Jan 2018 16:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336337 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal and confirming their entitlement to Cenvat credit for services distributed by the Head Office related to products manufactured in a different factory of the same company. The tribunal emphasized that there is no requirement for a one-to-one correlation between the credit distribution and the quantum of service used by a particular factory, citing legal provisions and precedents supporting the appellant's position. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 26 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=336337